I first read Faulkner's book, The Sound and the Fury, one summer on the beach when I was a teenager. My father had just had a heart attack and I was struggling to make sense of our fresh vulnerability as a family. I was also struggling to make sense of that book. I couldn't figure out who was talking in each section, but it didn't really matter to me, I just liked the jumbled mass of glorious words. I had to read it a second time before I figured out that each of the first three sections was narrated by a different brother of Caddy Compson's, and that the fourth section was the objective part, told by an omniscient narrator. I became intrigued by the concept of multiple viewpoints in a novel, of variations on a theme, and how it gave a fuller, richer picture of the characters and action in a book.
I was in my twenties by then and decided I wanted to write a book like Faulkner's, with different narrators for each section. And, I thought, why not make the book about eyesight, while I was at it? A book about a girl who is having a cornea transplant, told from multiple points of view. I began with her mother's perspective, giving details about the teenage girl and how her corneas were destroyed when she pulled an open bottle of bleach down on her face as a toddler.
The second section was written from the perspective of the younger brother, who had simply made a list, a very charming list, of all the things he wanted to show his sister when she could see again. The third section belonged to the doctor who explained the surgery and its possible failings, as well as described the psychological issues that newly sighted patients often face. The fourth and final section belonged to that ubiquitous omniscient narrator, who let the reader know if the surgery was a success or not, in a very subtle way.
I wrote it all down, just as I'd planned, then typed it up. And when I'd finished, I had about 16 pages total. Sixteen measly pages. What kind of book was that? Not much of one. So that was that. I wonder where I even put that thing.
The book I am working on now is a travel memoir, so the point of view is all mine - and that never changes. But my perspective changes in the three sections of the book. In the first, I am alone in Ireland, writing about myself; in the second, I am alone with my husband, writing about our hikes in the Burren and the Connemarra, as well as our marriage; in the third, we have our children back with us and I am writing about our family life and the time we spent together on two Irish farms. Like Olive, I've learned some life lessons over the years. I think I now have the drive and the discipline to go the distance - and get the book done.
Friday, June 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kathleen - you should find that story! It sounds fascinating. You should pull it back out, dust it off, and work on it some. I love the idea of different perspectives.
ReplyDeleteOne of my favorite authors, Orson Scott Card, wrote two books that are parallel in plot but from two very different perspectives. They are both wonderfully rich stories and amazingly different.
In my ghost hunting book I would love to approach the story from each of the main character's point of views with each new chapter.
Kathleen,
ReplyDeleteI too think you need to find that story, you have sparked my interest. Just think of it this way you have 16 pages to start with. Now that you have more experience you can probably come up with all kinds of things to add. Good luck with the multiple perspectives it seems difficult. I hope to succeed in creating a book with multiple perspectives one day.
Your memoir sounds interesting too. You could alternate between the two stories and that way you wouldn’t get burned out on either one. It sounds like you have the memoir all thought out. Good luck with both your stories.
Kathleen, you have had some fabulously rich experiences it seems! Not only do I envy your brush with Conroy, I envy your travel experiences! And I picked up _The Sound and the Fury_ yesterday all because of your post. Time to read some Faulkner and be inspired by point of view.
ReplyDeleteOh, and find that story!
Krist, that's great that you are going to give "The Sound and the Fury" a try! If you want to chat any about it, let me know. I've read it four times - it mesmerizes me.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOkay, love _The Sound and the Fury_! That was my first complicated book and my first Faulkner and I was immediately in awe of his talent and creativity. I love that you tried to write a book with different points of view after reading it, and I agree with the others that your book (the 16 pages) sounds intriguing.
ReplyDeleteDid you read _My Sister's Keeper_? You were before her so she kind of stole your idea. She told the same story (of a medical issue) from the perspective of each member of the family. The book never got boring because each person viewed the same events so differently. Out of the three Jodi Picoult books I've read, that one stands out for me because of the points of view.
As for your travel book - I love the way you want to structure it. It sounds great - and I imagine places are seen and experienced very differently depending on where you are in life and who you're with. You're definitely at a point where you can get the book done - and get it done beautifully!
Dina, I haven't read any Jodi Picoult at all, but I think I must because so many people seem to like her and recommend her. If you like her, I will give her a try. I had envisioned my (16-page)book as a Young Adult book anyway, so maybe reading Picoult would inspire me to try again.
ReplyDeleteI am also inspired by The Sound and the Fury .
ReplyDelete